Indicators of ecosystem degradation along an elevational gradient in the Mediterranean Andes

Indexado

WoS: WOS:001010662300001

Scopus: SCOPUS_ID:85160575575

Año

2023

Tipo

artículo de investigación

0
Citas Totales
0
Autores Afiliación Chile
0
Instituciones Chile
0
% Participación Internacional
0
Autores Afiliación Extranjera
0
Instituciones Extranjeras

Abstract

Successful restoration measures need a good understanding of how the composition, structure, and functioning of ecosystems change with degradation and what the best indicators of these changes are. To answer these questions, we worked on four ecosystem types in the Mediterranean Andes mountains in central Chile (from sclerophyllous forest to Andean shrublands), which represent an elevational gradient from 700 to 3,250 m. We sampled three plots on each of the three degradation levels (low, medium, and high) for each ecosystem at increasing distances from goat corrals. We measured 35 indicators that describe vegetation (14), soil (15), and ecosystem processes (6) for one growing season. Degradation caused a decrease in shrub cover, shrub productivity, the Normalized Community Structure Integrity Index (CSIIn), litter depth, total soil nitrogen and C/N ratio, and an increase in clay content. Plant species indicating low degradation were consistently native woody species. When comparing ecosystems (i.e., at different elevations) against the type of variable, process-based indicators showed more statistically significant differences. Based on their consistency across ecosystems and ease of measurement, we recommend using shrub cover and litter depth as indicators of degradation. Finally, we concluded that ecosystems are highly degraded when vegetation- and process-based indicators change ∼ 60% or when soil indicators change ∼ 25%. These results could also be used to set goals for restoration projects in these mountain ecosystems.

Revista

Métricas Externas

PlumX Altmetric Dimensions
INFORMACIÓN

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación

WOS
Environmental Sciences
Scopus
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior And Systematics
Decision Sciences (All)
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas
INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional

INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.

Autores - Afiliación

INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Origen de Citas Identificadas - Pais

INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la distribución de países cuyos autores citan a la publicación consultada.

Citas identificadas: Las citas provienen de documentos incluidos en la base de datos de DATACIENCIA

Citas Identificadas: 0.0 %
Citas No-identificadas: 100.0 %

Origen de Citas Identificadas - Institución

INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la distribución de instituciones nacionales o extranjeras cuyos autores citan a la publicación consultada.

Citas identificadas: Las citas provienen de documentos incluidos en la base de datos de DATACIENCIA

Citas Identificadas: 0.0 %
Citas No-identificadas: 100.0 %

Financiamiento

Fuente
CONAF
Native Forest Research Fund
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
National Agency of Research and Development
National Agency of Research and Development (ANID, Chile)
National Forest Service of Chile
National Forest Service of Chile (CONAF) through the Native Forest Research Fund
INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos

Agradecimiento
The authors acknowledge the funding from the National Forest Service of Chile (CONAF) through the Native Forest Research Fund, grant 022/2012, and the support of the National Agency of Research and Development (ANID, Chile) through grants PIA/BASAL FB210006 (IEB) and FB210018 (CHIC). The authors also wish to thank the administrators of Termas del Plomo and Hacienda Río Colorado for the authorization to work on their properties, Dr. Juan Pablo Fuentes for his advice on soil ecology, Paola Lambertini and Ariane Claussen for their help collecting the data, and two anonymous reviewers that helped to improve the manuscript with their comments.
The authors acknowledge the funding from the National Forest Service of Chile (CONAF) through the Native Forest Research Fund, grant 022/2012, and the support of the National Agency of Research and Development (ANID, Chile) through grants PIA/BASAL FB210006 (IEB) and FB210018 (CHIC) . The authors also wish to thank the administra- tors of Termas del Plomo and Hacienda Rio Colorado for the authori- zation to work on their properties, Dr. Juan Pablo Fuentes for his advice
INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Descarga los datos de esta página

Perfil Artículo