How many measurements are needed to estimate accurate daily and annual soil respiration fluxes? Analysis using data from a temperate rainforest

Indexado

WoS: WOS:000391563300003

Scopus: SCOPUS_ID:85006354678

Año

2016

Tipo

artículo de investigación

0
Citas Totales
0
Autores Afiliación Chile
0
Instituciones Chile
0
% Participación Internacional
0
Autores Afiliación Extranjera
0
Instituciones Extranjeras

Abstract

Making accurate estimations of daily and annual R-s fluxes is key for understanding the carbon cycle process and projecting effects of climate change. In this study we used high-frequency sampling (24 measurements per day) of R-s in a temperate rainforest during 1 year, with the objective of answering the questions of when and how often measurements should be made to obtain accurate estimations of daily and annual R-s. We randomly selected data to simulate samplings of 1, 2, 4 or 6 measurements per day (distributed either during the whole day or only during daytime), combined with 4, 6, 12, 26 or 52 measurements per year. Based on the comparison of partial-data series with the full-data series, we estimated the performance of different partial sampling strategies based on bias, precision and accuracy. In the case of annual R-s estimation, we compared the performance of interpolation vs. using non-linear modelling based on soil temperature. The results show that, under our study conditions, sampling twice a day was enough to accurately estimate daily R-s (RMSE < 10% of average daily flux), even if both measurements were done during daytime. The highest reduction in RMSE for the estimation of annual R-s was achieved when increasing from four to six measurements per year, but reductions were still relevant when further increasing the frequency of sampling. We found that increasing the number of field campaigns was more effective than increasing the number of measurements per day, provided a minimum of two measurements per day was used. Including night-time measurements significantly reduced the bias and was relevant in reducing the number of field campaigns when a lower level of acceptable error (RMSE < 5 %) was established. Using nonlinear modelling instead of linear interpolation did improve the estimation of annual R-s, but not as expected. In conclusion, given that most of the studies of R-s use manual sampling techniques and apply only one measurement per day, we suggest performing an intensive sampling at the beginning of the study to determine minimum daily and annual frequencies of sampling.

Revista

Revista ISSN
Biogeosciences 1726-4170

Métricas Externas

PlumX Altmetric Dimensions
INFORMACIÓN

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación

WOS
Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
Ecology
Scopus
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior And Systematics
Earth Surface Processes
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas
INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional

INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.

Autores - Afiliación

INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Origen de Citas Identificadas - Pais

INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la distribución de países cuyos autores citan a la publicación consultada.

Citas identificadas: Las citas provienen de documentos incluidos en la base de datos de DATACIENCIA

Citas Identificadas: 0.0 %
Citas No-identificadas: 100.0 %

Origen de Citas Identificadas - Institución

INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la distribución de instituciones nacionales o extranjeras cuyos autores citan a la publicación consultada.

Citas identificadas: Las citas provienen de documentos incluidos en la base de datos de DATACIENCIA

Citas Identificadas: 0.0 %
Citas No-identificadas: 100.0 %

Financiamiento

Fuente
National Commission for Scientific & Technological Research of Chile (grant FONDECYT)
National Commission for Scientific & Technological Research of Chile (grant FONDEQUIP)
INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos

Agradecimiento
The authors are grateful for the funding from the National Commission for Scientific & Technological Research of Chile (grants FONDEQUIP AIC-37 and FONDECYT 1130935). They also thank the administration and personnel at the Senda Darwin Biological Station and Richard Plant for his valuable comments on a preliminary version of the manuscript.
INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Descarga los datos de esta página

Perfil Artículo