Biomass and dominance of conservative species drive above-ground biomass productivity in a mediterranean-type forest of Chile

Indexado

WoS: WOS:000495645600001

Scopus: SCOPUS_ID:85074794822

Año

2019

Tipo

artículo de investigación

0
Citas Totales
0
Autores Afiliación Chile
0
Instituciones Chile
0
% Participación Internacional
0
Autores Afiliación Extranjera
0
Instituciones Extranjeras

Abstract

BackgroundForest productivity has a pivotal role in human well-being. Vegetation quantity, niche complementarity, mass-ratio, and soil resources are alternative/complementary ecological mechanisms driving productivity. One challenge in current forest management depends on identifying and manipulating these mechanisms to enhance productivity. This study assessed the extent to which these mechanisms control above-ground biomass productivity (AGBP) of a Chilean mediterranean-type matorral. AGBP measured as tree above-ground biomass changes over a 7-years period, was estimated for twelve 25mx25m plots across a wide range of matorral compositions and structures. Variables related to canopy structure, species and functional diversity, species and functional dominance, soil texture, soil water and soil nitrogen content were measured as surrogates of the four mechanisms proposed. Linear regression models were used to test the hypotheses. A multimodel inference based on the Akaike's information criterion was used to select the best models explaining AGBP and for identifying the relative importance of each mechanism.ResultsVegetation quantity (tree density) and mass-ratio (relative biomass of Cryptocarya alba, a conservative species) were the strongest drivers increasing AGBP, while niche complementarity (richness species) and soil resources (sand, %) had a smaller effect either decreasing or increasing AGBP, respectively. This study provides the first assessment of alternative mechanisms driving AGBP in mediterranean forests of Chile. There is strong evidence suggesting that the vegetation quantity and mass-ratio mechanisms are key drivers of AGBP, such as in other tropical and temperate forests. However, in contrast with other studies from mediterranean-type forests, our results show a negative effect of species diversity and a small effect of soil resources on AGBP.ConclusionAGBP in the Chilean matorral depends mainly on the vegetation quantity and mass-ratio mechanisms. The findings of this study have implications for matorral restoration and management for the production of timber and non-timber products and carbon sequestration.

Revista

Métricas Externas

PlumX Altmetric Dimensions
INFORMACIÓN

Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:

Disciplinas de Investigación

WOS
Forestry
Scopus
Forestry
Ecology
Nature And Landscape Conservation
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior And Systematics
SciELO
Sin Disciplinas
INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.

Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.

Colaboración Institucional

INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.

Autores - Afiliación

INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.

Origen de Citas Identificadas - Pais

INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la distribución de países cuyos autores citan a la publicación consultada.

Citas identificadas: Las citas provienen de documentos incluidos en la base de datos de DATACIENCIA

Citas Identificadas: 0.0 %
Citas No-identificadas: 100.0 %

Origen de Citas Identificadas - Institución

INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la distribución de instituciones nacionales o extranjeras cuyos autores citan a la publicación consultada.

Citas identificadas: Las citas provienen de documentos incluidos en la base de datos de DATACIENCIA

Citas Identificadas: 0.0 %
Citas No-identificadas: 100.0 %

Financiamiento

Fuente
CONICYT
Universidad de Chile
CONAF
Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
National Forestry Corporation
CONICYT (Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica)
INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Agradecimientos

Agradecimiento
Funding for this research was obtained from CONICyT (Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica) for the grant Fondecyt No 1150877. Additional funding was derived from the CONICyT doctoral grant No 21150802.
Funding for this research was obtained from CONICyT (Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica) for the grant Fondecyt No 1150877. Additional funding was derived from the CONICyT doctoral grant No 21150802. Acknowledgments
INFORMACIÓN

Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.

Descarga los datos de esta página

Perfil Artículo