WoS: WOS:000345815000021
Scopus: SCOPUS_ID:84908267083
2014
artículo de investigación
The demand for foods in central Chile is increasing and arable land is expanding rapidly onto floodplain soils, which are being cleared for maize cultivation. After harvest, a significant amount of residual nitrogen (N) may be still present in the soil in autumn-winter, when a high risk of nitrate leaching (NL) is expected due to occasional flooding events. Determining nitrate (NO3-) movement through the vadose zone is essential for studying the impact of agricultural practices on surface water quality. This study focused on understanding the processes of NO3- leaching in a floodplain environment and compared the effectiveness of four different methods: soil coring (TO), an observation well (T1), ceramic suction cup lysimeters (T2) and a capillary lysimeter (FullStop (TM) wetting front detector) (T3) for monitoring NL using an infiltration cylinder to simulate the conditions generated during flush flooding events during autumn-winter season in a typical coarse-textured alluvial floodplain soil. The comparison showed that TO and T3 can be used for monitoring NL during flush flooding events during autumn-winter season in stratified coarse-textured floodplain soils, whereas T1 and T2 are not appropriate for these site conditions. A correlation was found between NO3 and soluble salt (Cl- concentration and EC) only in the first measurements after the dry summer period. The results of this study suggest that most of the surplus N could be leached by excessive irrigation during the crop growing season (spring-summer), while a lower amount of residual N may still be present in the soil in autumn-winter available to be lost by NL during flush flooding events. Overall the two monitored flushing events could have leached around 6% of the total NO3-N load. There was no significant effect of sampler devices on saturated hydraulic conductivity. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
| Revista | ISSN |
|---|---|
| Agricultural Water Management | 0378-3774 |
Muestra métricas de impacto externas asociadas a la publicación. Para mayor detalle:
| WOS |
|---|
| Agronomy |
| Water Resources |
| Scopus |
|---|
| Agronomy And Crop Science |
| Soil Science |
| Water Science And Technology |
| Earth Surface Processes |
| SciELO |
|---|
| Sin Disciplinas |
Muestra la distribución de disciplinas para esta publicación.
Publicaciones WoS (Ediciones: ISSHP, ISTP, AHCI, SSCI, SCI), Scopus, SciELO Chile.
Muestra la distribución de colaboración, tanto nacional como extranjera, generada en esta publicación.
Muestra la afiliación y género (detectado) para los co-autores de la publicación.
Muestra la distribución de países cuyos autores citan a la publicación consultada.
Citas identificadas: Las citas provienen de documentos incluidos en la base de datos de DATACIENCIA
Citas Identificadas: 32.0 %
Citas No-identificadas: 68.0 %
Muestra la distribución de instituciones nacionales o extranjeras cuyos autores citan a la publicación consultada.
Citas identificadas: Las citas provienen de documentos incluidos en la base de datos de DATACIENCIA
Citas Identificadas: 32.0 %
Citas No-identificadas: 68.0 %
| Fuente |
|---|
| Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico |
| Fondecyt de Iniciación |
| Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo CientÃfico y Tecnológico |
| Department of Soil and Engineering at the University of Chile |
Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.
| Agradecimiento |
|---|
| The authors thank the Department of Soil and Engineering at the University of Chile for supporting this study. This research was partially funded by FONDECYT de Iniciacion 2011 grant no. 11110464. |
| The authors thank the Department of Soil and Engineering at the University of Chile for supporting this study. This research was partially funded by FONDECYT de Iniciación 2011 grant no. 11110464 . |
Muestra la fuente de financiamiento declarada en la publicación.